Indirect taxation is the key that controls and regulates unwitting slaves

By David Baugh

As I write, I am in solitary confinement (administrative segregation) for refusing to be a slave to insolent, disobedient public servant usurpers. They tried forcing me to sign two documents, which, in effect, would’ve waived some of my rights and had me agreeing to work for the Missouri Department of Transportation (MODOT) picking up litter and cutting weeds, etc., along the State highways for $9 per day. I declared certain physical impairments and my age (61) as objections, but, after being told that refusing to sign would count as a conduct violation (CDV) for disobeying an order, I signed noting it was under threat of damages or injuries, not of free will, and that I was reserving all my rights.

The very next day, Sept. 22, 2004, I was handcuffed, brought here and told I would be taken out of "the hole" from which I’m writing on the following Friday, Oct. 8th. And there are other sanctions. I objected, having had no hearing, nor opportunity to place my witness under oath and get his testimony or offer evidence. Said witness was the public "servant" who wrote me up, my evidence the statutes and regulations which govern his actions. I was ready to have some real fun with this incompetent parasite but, alas, there’s no such thing as due process in this joint.

There is no doubt in my mind that such actions against me are selective, vindictive and malicious retaliation for my outspoken criticism of the fascism these parasites are practicing. This same clown ordered me to undergo a psychiatric exam because he felt my statements were a threat to the security of the institution and "bizarre." Guess his cognitive dissonance prohibited him from accepting the truth and reality I expound. He may also have been unhappy with my written grievances and petition for habeas corpus in the local circuit court. The judge ordered Superintendent Michael Bowersox to appear on Oct. 8 and show cause why I should not have an evidentiary hearing.

Yes, the quisling, pettifogger shyster bar association lawyers have rendered habeas corpus conditional, giving government the advantage over the petitioner. Be that as it may, I have them beat as a matter of law; the facts of record support my claim. While at the Moberly Correctional Center, I was able to work into a law clerk position in the library, and do some research. A few years ago when taking the exam to become a "certified independent representative" of the Save-a-Patriot Fellowship, after having studied how the federal tax laws are set up, I noticed their similarity with the licensing and registration laws. Having known this was a form of taxation, I had not until then understood how it was being enforced. Like others, I had relied on certain "Patriot mythology" as it’s called, and soon found that didn’t work.

But when I started studying and using actual, fundamental law, and civil and criminal procedure, that was improvement but still not success. Something was yet missing. What, then?

First, I found that the statutory scheme was actually civil. So how are they making it criminal? The answer is by our consent to be criminally prosecuted, even when no crime has taken place. Then I connected the property and its use with the person. Now I know how to beat them every time.

I had them beaten after my trial at the sentencing hearing, but didn’t know how to argue the point. I had submitted my motion for a judgment of acquittal, but the judge refused to rule on it, and left it in the record as a pending motion. Thus the due process violations were so many and flagrant, they made a mockery of fundamental American jurisprudence that even the unlearned could discern. It took 3½ years, 6 judges and I’ve lost count of the prosecutors to do this to me, plus those 12 woefully ignorant members of the jury panel.

Why such extraordinary effort? Because this issue is key to ruling and regulating the unwitting slaves: "human resource assets" claimed as collateral for the national debt ever since the bankruptcy of the federal government in 1933 – as brought about through the fraudulent Federal Reserve Act of 1913 just 20 years earlier. This is clearly evidenced by the fact that the social "surveillance" number became the drivers license number. Social Security, like the drivers license, started out as a voluntary measure for "safety and security" after the international banksters caused economic chaos in 1929. Though there had always been a tax on the transporting of freight or passengers for profit or gain, it was made to appear that, for "safety and security," everyone should of their own accord ask for a license, vehicle registration and the like.

When you apply for that "protection," however, by admitting your use of taxable property on the public roads for profit or gain, you’ve granted the jurisdiction and waived rights protected by State and U.S. Constitutions. Over the years, both through indoctrination and people’s general habit of blind obedience based on nothing but vague and imprecise notions, our public "policy" has turned into "law" enforced by "policy" (police) enforcement officers. Thus, this stealthy encroachment was, and to this day remains, one of the main planks and crucial, integral part of the Communist conquest of America, using the Hegelian principle.

In examining the legal foundation for imposing a "motor vehicle driver’s license tax" by Section 4(a) Missouri Constitution, one finds that it is an excise (indirect) tax laid upon persons or property indirectly, not directly, based on the "nature" and "characteristic" of the property. Why is it indirect and not direct? Because if it were direct it would violate Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution. Thus, we see that it is applicable only against those persons whose use of vehicles answers the nature and characteristic taxable under said law, a specific class of activity for which it was written. And no law can be ambiguous or vague. Judges may not write in that which isn’t manifest in its terms. There can be no legislating from the bench! But that’s just what has been going on, due to the woeful ignorance of the people.

Think of the millions, nay billions, that will be lost revenue if folks become aware of this scam and fraud. Imagine the power and control those mattoids and charlatans stand to lose! Which explains why all the quisling, pettifogger, shyster lawyers who have infiltrated, corrupted, subverted and perverted our justice system go to such extraordinary measures to try and crush the truth and its messenger.

The power to tax is the power to destroy, no matter in what form the tax is levied or for what purportedly legitimate reason. So eternal vigilance is essential to safeguard our liberty and the freedom to exercise and enjoy it.

Getting back to my current predicament, as a prisoner of war the law is in my favor and supported by the facts of record. If I’m unsuccessful with this habeas corpus in the local circuit, I’ll resubmit it into the court of appeals, or on to the State supreme court. I also have filed a petition in prohibition, or, in the alternative, mandamus in the court of appeals which was denied, and am in the process of transferring it to the State supreme court. Additionally, I’ve prepared a petition for declaratory judgment for such filing. Having been placed in solitary confinement has temporarily halted some of my litigation, because all my paper have been taken from me. I have filed for writ of mandamus asking the local circuit court to order them to give me my papers, and filed grievance demanding same immediately or be sued. This week, they are confronted with truth and reality, shoved in their faces by one who will not compromise.

By asking the State to issue you title to your nontaxable private automobile, it then becomes taxable "personal" property used for some privileged public purpose, and no longer for the "enjoyment of the gains of one’s own industries" protected by State and U.S. Constitutions. The legislature has no legitimate reason to compel all citizens to first get its permission via some scheme of licensure to use our public roads. Why? Because we have no such power to grant!

In my case, they dropped the charges of failure to register because it is impossible to record an automobile which isn’t titled with the State agency. But even if you are a licensee operating a titled and registered motor vehicle with a suspended or revoked license, as this is a civil traffic infraction its violator is subject only to fine or forfeiture, and no legal disability or disadvantage may be applied, 556.021, RSTMO. So how can they put people in prison for this offense? Constructive fraud and misapplication of law! I would also point out that employing criminal process to enforce civil liabilities amounts to slavery, and violates the 13th Amendment as well as our Bill of Rights.

Tyranny, anyone? Criminal extortion? Treason? Theft? Oppression in office? How about "criminal syndicalism," which is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as "organized terrorism"? It’s time to wake up, America! Who are the real terrorists?

I’ve just been informed the bastards are transferring me to another facility. Keep me in your prayers.

————————————————

For more that will help you understand his legal battles. See www.gulftel.com/firstfreedom/45.htm (a constitutional review citing the differences between direct and indirect taxes).